Legal Opinion

Jannot v. Jannot

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 2003No. 72284-6PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

When a parent petitions for modification of an existing parenting plan, RCW 26.09.270 requires the trial court to first determine, based on affidavits submitted by the parties, whether adequate cause exists to justify a full modification hearing. At issue here is the proper scope of appellate review where a trial court has determined that a petitioner failed to establish adequate cause.

FACTS

The marriage of Stephanie and David Jannot was dissolved in 1991. At that time they had one child. After the dissolution, the couple had a second child. The final parenting plans placed the primary care of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rau v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  2. In Re the Marriage of LandryWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Lambert v. LambertWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In Re the Marriage of RoordaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  5. Jannot v. JannotCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of RideoutWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In re the Marriage of HornerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. SisouvanhWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. In Re Marriage of RideoutWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In Re Marriage of HornerWashington Supreme Court · 2004

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API