Legal Opinion

State v. O'Neal

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 15, 2005No. Nos. 29150-9-II; 29154-1-II; 29523-7-IIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 In their consolidated matter, William “Harry” O’Neal, Jesse O’Neal, and Gregory O’Neal appeal convictions of manufacturing methamphetamine. Greg1 also appeals his convictions of manufacturing marijuana, first degree unlawful possession of a firearm, and possession of a machine gun. The trial court imposed firearm enhancements on both of Greg’s manufacturing counts and a firearm enhancement on Harry’s and Jesse’s methamphetamine manufacturing counts.

Houghton, J.

¶2 The O’Neals raise multiple assignments of error regarding their convictions and sentences. Because the charging document lacked…

2Cases cited73 opinions

Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

State v. O'NEALCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005