Legal Opinion

State v. Grell

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2006No. CR-01-0275-APPublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERCH, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 Appellant Shawn Grell was convicted of first degree murder in 2000 following a bench trial on stipulated facts. After an aggravation and mitigation hearing, the judge sentenced Grell to death. While Grell prepared his direct appeal, the United States Supreme Court decided eases that held (1) that juries must find the aggravating factors that allow the imposition of a sentence of death, Ring v. Arizona (Ring II), 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), and (2) that mentally retarded defendants may not be executed, Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S.…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. WereOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. SanchezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Warren Lee Hill, Jr. v. Carl HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  4. State v. RoqueArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API