Miller v. Royal Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge:
Appellant, Royal Insurance Company (“Royal”), challenges the lower court’s judgment upon its order denying appellant’s petition to modify the award of arbitrators. That court found that no error of law was committed by the arbitrators in stacking uninsured motorist coverages under a commercial fleet policy. We disagree and reverse the order of the court below.
This case arose from a motor vehicle collision involving appellee, Mary Ann Miller, and an uninsured motorist. Mrs. Miller was driving a vehicle owned by Wes II Air Freight (“Wes II”) and assigned to her husband, Joseph…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
- Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. StanfieldKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
- Lambert v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Lundy v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Selected Risks Insurance Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Egan v. USI Mid-Atlantic, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Boris v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Everhart v. PMA Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Hunyady v. Aetna Life & CasualtySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.