MacDougall v. Penna. Power & Light Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maxey,
This is an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Northumberland County, entered on the verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $10,455, after denial of defendant’s motions for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial.
Plaintiff is a resident of the Borough of Mount Carmel and is a tinner and plumber by trade. Defendant is engaged in the business of supplying electric light, heat and power in that borough.
On March 30, 1928, which was a rainy day, plaintiff was employed by one J. Walter Penman, owner of a building on the east side of Pear Street,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Koelsch v. Philadelphia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Daltry v. Media Electric Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Alexander v. Nanticoke Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Cadillac Motor Car Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Otto E. Pritchard v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Maize v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Stark v. Lehigh Foundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Stewart v. MottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.