Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 1, 2025No. 126279Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 126,279 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. DVONTE JAMAL BROWN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged in a criminal case, we review the evidence in a light most favorable to the State to determine whether a rational fact- finder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. An appellate court does not reweigh evidence, resolve conflicts in the evidence, or pass on the credibility of witnesses. 2. While the presence of THC in a substance may be relevant to a fact-finder's determination…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State v. GunbySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. State v. PeppersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. State v. LowerySupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  5. State v. BeachSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API