Towle v. Sweeney
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.
The firm of Gardner & Boyden, as contractors, entered into a contract with one Probert, as owner, for the erection of a dwelling-house in San Francisco, and at the same time the defendants herein, as sureties, in connection with said contractors, as principals, executed a bond in the penal sum of $1,500 to any and all persons who should perform labor or furnish materials to the contractors, conditioned that, if the said contractors “shall fully pay to the said person or persons performing labor or furnishing materials” the value of such labor or materials, said obligation should be void;…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Sichel v. De CarrilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- County of Sonoma v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Eising v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Bridges v. BlakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Regents of University of California v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Munsingwear, Inc. v. TullisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Mitchell v. TowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Taylor v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.