Stimson Mill Co. v. Los Angles Traction Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. •W. P. Fitzgerald, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, C.
—This suit was brought to foreclose a lien for materials furnished by plaintiff in the construction of defendant’s bridge over the Los Angeles River in the city of Los Angeles. The plaintiff had judgment, from which and from an order denying its motion for a new trial the defendant appeals. The bridge was constructed under an unrecorded contract with Sawyer and Arthur, partners, by the terms of which it was to consist of five steel spans and the balance of wood and steel, or of wood. By the terms of the contract it was to be completed November 9, 1898; and it was stipulated that for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Giant Powder Co. v. San Diego Flume Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- Silvester v. Coe Quartz Mine Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- Joost v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Patent Brick Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Gordon Hardware Co. v. San Francisco & San Rafael RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Chicago Lumber Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Potter Manufacturing Co. v. A. B. Meyer & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Ludolph v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Williamson-Halsell-Frasier Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- California Portland Cement Co. v. Wentworth Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.