Silvester v. Coe Quartz Mine Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Nevada County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
This action was brought by three plaintiffs, jointly, to foreclose their separate material-men’s liens on the mining claim of the defendant for materials furnished for repairs on said claim. The work on the mining property was done by a contractor, who was to erect hydraulic-power hoisting-works and pumping-works building, gallows-frame and track, lay down a water-pipe to supply water to the mine, and to pump out the mine to the third level. There was but one contract to do all of the work named for a certain number of the shares of stock of the company, and the contract was not recorded.
The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Helm v. ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by29 opinions
- Halbert's Lumber, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Missoula Mercantile Co. v. O'DonnellMontana Supreme Court · 1900
- Wilson v. NugentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Ensele v. JolleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Bewick v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.