Legal Opinion

W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Shogren

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 9, 1934No. 29,999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JULIUS J. OLSON, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment entered pursuant to findings for defendants.

The action was brought by plaintiff to recover a claimed balance of $555.27 due it for goods sold to defendant Shogren pursuant to a written contract. The other defendants are sureties. The contract provides that plaintiff will sell “such reasonable quantities of its products as the buyer [Shogren] may order at wholesale prices.” Either party to the contract is authorized to terminate the same upon written notice to the other. In the event of such termination, “all accounts incurred…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lundblad v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. Disbrow v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. Bosshard v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Eagle Roller-Mill Co. v. DillmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. RutkowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. EllsworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Thayer v. DuffySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Thayer v. DuffySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API