Legal Opinion
Thayer v. Duffy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 16, 1953No. 35,934Published
1Opinion of the Court
240 Minn. 234 (1953)
RUSTAN O. THAYER, AS RECEIVER OF GENERAL WOODWORKING, INC.,
v.
HARRY DUFFY, ADMINISTRATOR c.t.a. OF ESTATE OF GEORGE A. MOORESIDE.
GLADYS SCOTT AND OTHERS, ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS, APPELLANTS.
ADOLPH CARLSON AND ANOTHER, ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS, RESPONDENTS.[1]
No. 35,934.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
October 16, 1953.
Hall, Smith & Hedlund, for appellants Gladys Scott and others.
Henry F. Simons, for appellant Harry Duffy.
John J. Stoller and Maurice A. Hessian, for respondents.
DELL, CHIEF JUSTICE.
Appeal from a judgment determining (1) the rights of General Woodworking, Inc., and its…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Lundblad v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Meldrum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
- Kells v. Nelson-Tenney Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Noonan v. SpearSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.