Legal Opinion

Eagle Roller-Mill Co. v. Dillman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 19, 1897No. Nos. 10,135—(89)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by defendants McBain and another from an order of the district court for Brown county, Webber, J., sustaining a demurrer of plaintiff to one of the defenses set up in their answer.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Summarized, the material allegations of the complaint are that the plaintiff, being about to employ the defendant Dillman as its agent to purchase, sell, and handle wheat and other personal property at a place called “Cobden,” and to furnish him money, grain, and other property for that purpose, Dillman, as principal, and the other defendants, as sureties, executed to plaintiff a bond, conditioned that, in the performance of his duties as such agent, he would, among other things, not sell, pledge, or dispose of any wheat or other property purchased for the plaintiff, or with its money,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Daniels v. BarneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Disbrow v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. State Ex Rel. Barnes v. TauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Bosshard v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Kelley v. KaniosDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
  5. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. ShogrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API