Legal Opinion
Copper State Thrift and Loan v. Bruno
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided April 7, 1987No. 860303-CAPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILLINGS, Judge:
Plaintiff Copper State Thrift and Loan (“Copper State”) brought an action against Defendant Michael Bruno to recover on a promissory note. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Bruno on grounds of collateral estoppel, which Copper State appeals. We affirm the district court.
On January 12, 1982, Michael Bruno and Stephen Bruno, father and son, executed as co-makers a $9,519.43 promissory note in favor of Copper State. The proceeds of the note were to be used to purchase rubber for tire recapping, and the loan was secured by tire recapping equipment…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Ringwood v. Foreign Auto Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Brownfield v. City of YakimaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State ex rel. J.J.T.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- Mel Trimble Real Estate v. Monte Vista Ranch, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988
- Atiya v. Salt Lake CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.