Legal Opinion
Milliner v. Elmer Fox and Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1974No. 13520PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUCKETT, Justice:
Plaintiffs initiated these proceedings in the court below seeking to recover for the loss in value of certain shares of stock they had purchased from Commercial Liquidators, Inc., a Utah corporation. Motions to dismiss were made by the defendants, and after a' hearing was had the court ordered the complaint dismissed.
The plaintiffs’ complaint alleges that the defendant Elmer Fox and Co. were public accountants employed by Commercial Liquidators, Inc., and that the defendants Don A. Stringham, Larry M. Follett, and Stringham & Follett, a professional corporation, were lawyers…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Ryan v. KanneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- State Street Trust Co. v. ErnstNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Rusch Factors, Inc. v. LevinDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1968
- Shatterproof Glass Corporation v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
3Cited by41 opinions
- SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
- Cook Consultants, Inc. v. Larson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
- Touche Ross & Co. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Ryan Harvey, Rocks Off, Inc. v. Ute Indian Tribe of the UintahUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Young Ex Rel. Young v. Salt Lake City School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2002
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.