Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Aufdengarten

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1894No. 5075PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from the district court of Keith county. Tried below before Church, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, C. J.

This action was brought by Charles McDonald upon two promissory notes signed by the defendant in error, each for the sum of $2,000, payable to the order of the Keith County Bank, and bearing daté September 10,1889. • The petition contains the usual averments. The answer sets up the defense of usury. Plaintiff for reply denies each and every allegation contained in the answer, and avers that he purchased the notes before their maturity, for a valuable consideration, and without notice or knowledge of any of the transactions or matters pleaded in the answer. Upon the trial the jury returned the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dobbins v. ObermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Knox v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  3. State Savings Bank v. ScottNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Suiter v. Park National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  5. First National Bank v. Security National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City National Bank v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Hill v. . LindsaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Bolen v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Detweiler v. FormanNebraska Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API