Legal Opinion

City National Bank v. Thomas

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1896No. 8050PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error from the district court of Adams county. Tried below before Beall,. J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

This case was before tbe court in 1894 and the judgment of the district court therein was reversed. (Thomas v. City Nat. Bank of Hastings, 40 Neb., 501.) On a new trial in the district court there was a verdict followed byjudgmeut for the plaintiff. This judgment the bank seeks to reverse. The former report of the case contains a sufficient statement of the facts, except, perhaps, as to some minor features which will be mentioned in the course of the opinion.

The report contains what purports to be a bill of exceptions; but this was, on motion of Thomas, quashed at the *863last term of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Farmers & Mechanics' Bank v. Butchers & Drovers' BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. People's Bank v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. West St. Louis Savings Bank v. Shawnee County BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Hill v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Carleton v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Van Auker v. Steckley's Hybrid Seed Corn Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Jones v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Kaspar v. SchackNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Greer v. ChelewskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Seng v. PayneNebraska Supreme Court · 1910

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API