Legal Opinion
Knox v. Williams
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Field, J. cited: Tompkins v. Batie, 11 Neb., 151. Abbott’s Trial Evidence, 141. Adams v. Bank, 4 Neb., 370. Jones Chattel Mortgages, Secs. 434-439. cited: Murry v. Oimningham, 10 Neb., 167. Rice v. Cam, 35 N. W. R., 465. Loughborough v. McNevin, 14 Pac. Rep., 369. Wells on Replevin, Secs. 54, 362.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
In July, 1885, the defendant in error executed and delivered to John P. Dorr a promissory note, of which the following is a copy:
“Lincoln, Neb., July 29, 1885.
“January 29, 1886, after date, for value received, I promise to pay to tbe order of John P. Dorr three bun*631dred and forty dollai-s, with interest at the rate of 10 peícent per annum from date until paid: Payable at Dorr Pro’s, office, Lincoln.
“$340. Due Jan. 29, —86. Ms
“Attest: H. H. Bulkeley. George X Williams.
This note was secured by a chattel mortgage on certain personal property of Williams.
In January, 1886, Williams executed a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tompkins v. BatieNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
- State Savings Bank v. ScottNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
- Nelson v. HurfordNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
- Darst v. BackusNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Beck v. Associates Discount Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- Keene v. BehanWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- M. P. Musser & Co. v. KingNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Violet v. RoseNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Exeter National Bank v. OrchardNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.