Legal Opinion
Suiter v. Park National Bank
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided October 11, 1892PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Error to the district court for Saline county. Tried below before Morris, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Maxwell, Ch. J.
This action was brought in the court below upon a promissory note, as follows:
“$4,309.38. De Witt, Neb., January 10, 1889.
“On the 10th day of June, 1889, after date, for value received, I promise to pay to the order of Fayette I. Foss,' of Crete, Neb., four thousand three hundred nine and dollars, with interest at the rate of 10 per cent per annum from maturity until paid. .Negotiable and payable at the De Witt Bank at De Witt, Neb.
“No. 1377. Due 6-10-89. Joseph Suiter.”
Said note was endorsed as follows:
“ For value received I hereby waive notice of protest and non-payment, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rolfe v. PilloudNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- Houck v. GueNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by13 opinions
- Davis v. DennertNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- Sorensen v. SorensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Modern Woodman Accident Ass'n v. ShryockNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Bainter v. AppelNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- Sgroi v. Yellow Cab & Baggage Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.