Legal Opinion

Steppelman v. State Highway Commission of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1983No. WD 33677PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs filed their petition for administrative review of a determination by the State Highway Commission that they were not entitled to relocation payments under 42 U.S.C.A. § 4622, after the Commission took a portion of their property (by deed) for the construction of U.S. Highway 54 north of Jefferson City. It was stipulated that if plaintiffs were entitled to recover, it would be for $4,795.26, and the trial court entered judgment for that amount.

For the deed, which covered five acres of plaintiffs’ Mobile Park, including 18 or 19 trailer pads and a greater…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Denton Construction Co. v. Missouri State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  2. Blackwell Printing Co. v. Blackwell-Wielandy Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Fair v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Bernard McMenamy Contractors, Inc. v. Missouri State Highway CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Beaird-Poulan Division of Emerson Electric Co. v. Department of HighwaysDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vilelle v. Reorganized School District No. R-1Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Dale v. RahnMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. JUSTIN WAYNE DALE v. MISSOURI HIGHWAYS and TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API