Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. Agyei
Supreme Court of the United States
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Justice O’Connor, with whom Justice Scalia joins, and with whom The Chief Justice joins in part,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I agree with the Court that 42 U. S. C. §1988 allows compensation for the work of paralegals and law clerks at market rates, and therefore join Parts I and III of its opinion. I do not join Part II, however, for in my view the Eleventh Amendment does not permit enhancement of attorney’s *290fees assessed against a State as compensation for delay in payment.
The Eleventh Amendment does not, of course, provide a State with across-the-board immunity from all…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.