Legal Opinion

Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. Agyei

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 19, 1989No. 88-64PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

491 U.S. 274 (1989)

MISSOURI ET AL.

v.

JENKINS, BY HER FRIEND, AGYEI, ET AL.

No. 88-64.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued February 21, 1989

Decided June 19, 1989

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

Bruce Farmer, Assistant Attorney General of Missouri, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were William L. Webster, Attorney General, Terry Allen, Deputy Attorney General, and Michael L. Boicourt and Bart A. Matanic, Assistant Attorneys General.

Jay Topkis argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Julius LeVonne Chambers, Charles…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Brennan; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. (SS) Ohman v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  2. (SS) Standen v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. Celestine v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. Chapman v. JacobsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. Julian III Flores v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API