Legal Opinion
Manocherian v. Lenox Hill Hospital
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 6, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*983OPINION OF THE COURT
Myriam J. Altman, J.
In this consolidated action,1 plaintiffs move for summary judgment in the form of a declaration that they are not required to offer renewal leases to defendant Lenox Hill Hospital (Lenox Hill) for six rent-stabilized apartments occupied by Lenox Hill employees. Plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of chapter 940 of the Laws of 1984 which amended the Rent Stabilization Law so as to require landlords to provide renewal leases to not-for-profit hospitals based on the primary residency status of the hospital’s employee-subtenant, rather than on the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Manocherian v. Lenox Hill HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Manocherian v. Lenox Hill HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Manocherian v. Lenox Hill HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Manocherian v. Lenox Hill HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Manocherian v. Lenox Hill HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993