Legal Opinion
Manocherian v. Lenox Hill Hospital
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 20, 1994PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bellacosa, J.
Plaintiffs, owners of several New York City rent-stabilized apartments at issue here, seek summary judgment to declare chapter 940 of the Laws of 1984 unconstitutional and related relief. That enactment requires the owners to offer renewal leases to defendant-respondent, Lenox Hill Hospital, a not-for-profit hospital enterprise on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, for apartments occupied by some of the hospital’s employees. Supreme Court and the Appellate Division upheld the validity of the statute and plaintiffs appeal as of right on constitutional grounds…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Gazza v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Drucker v. MauroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Twin Lakes Development Corp. v. Town of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Avon Bard Co. v. Aquarian FoundationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.