Legal Opinion

Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 2004PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

Irwin A. Popowsky, Consumer Advocate (Consumer Advocate), petitions for review of an adjudication of the Public Utility Commission (PUC) that adopted the recommendation of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to dismiss three complaints filed against Pennsylvania-American Water Company (the Utility).1 The complain*1099ants requested the PUC to order the Utility to install, at the Utility’s sole expense, approximately 19 miles of water mains and a one million-gallon storage tank in Mount Pleasant Township (Township) at a cost of $6.3 million. The PUC, however, held that this…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Uniontown Area School District v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Rohrbaugh v. Pennsylvania PUCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Elite Industries, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Philadelphia Suburban Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Saturday Family LP v. Com. Techspec Inc. v. Com.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API