Legal Opinion
Elite Industries, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 24, 2003No. 155 MAP 2002PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EAKIN, Justice.
On March 23, 2000, Perry J. Camerlengo applied to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) for a certificate of public convenience to operate a limousine service within Pennsylvania. Appellees and others filed protests to the application after it was published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin.
On March 31, 2000, Camerlengo filed an application for temporary authority, which was also protested after publication in the Pennsylvania Bulletin. Camerlengo’s application also sought a waiver of § 29.333(a). 1 The PUC granted temporary authority and the requested waiver.
On…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Rohrbaugh v. Pennsylvania PUCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Seaboard Tank Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Tire Jockey Service, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Slippery Rock Area School District v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Chester Water Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.