Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1980No. 5PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

Defendant in his brief expressly abandons all of his assignments of error. Under Rule 10 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, review is foreclosed except insofar as exceptions are made the bases of assignments of error and those assignments are brought foward. Nevertheless, due to the gravity of the sentence imposed, we elected, pursuant to our inherent authority and Rule 2, to consider defendant’s arguments as presented in his brief. See State v. Adams, 298 N.C. 802, 260 S.E. 2d 431 (1979).

Defendant’s brief is addressed solely to the failure of the judge…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. PropstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. DooleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. BunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. BrockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API