Legal Opinion

State v. Brock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1982No. 47A81PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Justice.

All of defendant’s assignments of error relate to the prosecutor’s jury argument and the trial court’s jury instructions. We find no merit in any of the assignments and leave undisturbed the judgment of the trial court.

Defendant contends first that the prosecutor violated his rights guaranteed by Article I, Section 23, of the state constitution, and the fifth and fourteenth amendments to the federal constitution “by arguing to the jury that evidence of defendant’s post-arrest silence was evidence of his guilt of the crimes charged.”

Defendant testified that while he was present…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. AsheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API