Legal Opinion
Kenagy v. Benton County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 11, 1992No. LUBA 91-097; CA A72690PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Benton County approved Ranta’s1 application to construct an accessory dwelling for a relative on his property in an EFU zone. LUBA affirmed the county’s decision and petitioners seek review. We reverse.
The dwelling is to be occupied by Ranta’s son and daughter-in-law, whose assistance he asserts that he needs for farm operations. We take the facts from LUBA’s opinion:
“The subject parcel is approximately 37 acres in size. Currently, there is one dwelling on the parcel, and it is occupied by [Ranta,] the property owner. There is a fenced pasture area, consisting of approximately 9 acres, behind…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Newcomer v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Newcomer v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Von Lubken v. Hood River CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Hopper v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Von Lubken v. Hood River CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kenagy v. Benton CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Brentmar v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Delta Property Co. v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015