Legal Opinion
Newcomer v. Clackamas County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 23, 1988No. LUBA 87-107; CA A48256PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Respondent Newcomer and intervenor Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD), see ORAP 5.18, seek Supreme Court review and, thereby, this court’s reconsideration of our decision. 92 Or App 174, 758 P2d 369 (1988). We grant reconsideration and modify our former opinion.
We concluded, inter alia, that the definition of “farm use” in ORS 215.203(2)(a) is inapplicable to ORS 215.283(1)(f). We therefore reasoned that the “current employment of land” for agricultural purposes, a component of the ORS 215.203 definition, is not invariably required for a farm dwelling on a new farm to be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Doughton v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Knapp v. City of North BendOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Newcomer v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Forster v. Polk CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Kenagy v. Benton CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Dan Gile & Associates, Inc. v. McIverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Brentmar v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.