Legal Opinion

Von Lubken v. Hood River County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 6, 1991No. LUBA 90-031; CA A66473PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Respondents Hood River County and Brookside, Inc., petition for Supreme Court review of our opinion. 104 Or App 683, 803 P2d 750 (1990). We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, and allow it only to address respondents’ argument that our opinion is inconsistent with J. R. Golf Services, Inc. v. Linn County, 62 Or App 360, 661 P2d 91 (1983).

We concluded in Golf Services that section 21.450 of Linn County’s zoning ordinance, which contained restrictions on nonfarm “uses” in exclusive farm use zones, was inapplicable to golf courses that were conditionally permissible in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Von Lubken v. Hood River CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. J. R. Golf Services, Inc. v. Linn CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kenagy v. Benton CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Waker Associates, Inc. v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Von Lubken v. Hood River CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Brentmar v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Kenagy v. Benton CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API