Legal Opinion
Kenagy v. Benton County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 9, 1992No. LUBA 91-097; CA A75580PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Benton County approved respondent Ranta’s 1 application to construct a dwelling for his son and daughter-in-law on property in an EFU zone. Petitioners appealed to LUBA, which affirmed the county’s decision and held that Ranta was a “farm operator” for purposes of ORS 215.283(1)(e) and the analogous provision of the county’s development code (ordinance). Petitioners then sought our review. In Kenagy v. Benton County, 112 Or App 17, 826 P2d 1047 (1992), 2 weheld that LUBA also had to determine whether the son’s assistance was required in conducting farm operations, and we remanded for LUBA to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Byrd v. StringerOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Cope v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Newcomer v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Foland v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Forster v. Polk CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- West v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Gilmour v. Linn CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.