Legal Opinion
United States v. Salyer
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 15, 2012No. CR. 10-0061 LKKPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1016 ORDER
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The assigned district judge, Judge Karl-ton, previously heard (1) the government’s motion to listen to and use, as they believe appropriate, phone calls made by defendant Salyer to his various attorneys while he was in pretrial detention in the Sacramento County Jail, Dckt. No. 129; and (2) Salyer’s motion to suppress the recordings, relying on the attorney-client privilege, Dckt. Nos. 141-M3. In an earlier order, Judge Karlton resolved all other issues raised in the parties’ motions but referred to the undersigned certain issues…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- United States v. RicheyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Curtis R. Martin, Jr., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Ronald Allen Smith v. Jack McCormick Warden, Montana State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Jesse J. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Sanmina CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Rogers v. GiurbinoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
- Phillips v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2013