Legal Opinion

Still v. Cunningham

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2004No. S-10680, S-10719PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

94 P.3d 1104 (2004)

Vern T. STILL and Wanda Still, Appellants and Cross-Appellees,

v.

Lloyd CUNNINGHAM, as Assignee of Northrim Bank, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.

Nos. S-10680, S-10719.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

July 9, 2004.

Thomas V. Van Flein, Clapp, Peterson & Stowers, LLC, Anchorage, for Appellants and Cross-Appellees.

Gregory L. Youngmun, John D. Harjehausen, Delisio Moran Geraghty & Zobel, P.C., Anchorage, for Appellee and Cross-Appellant.

Before: BRYNER, Chief Justice, MATTHEWS, EASTAUGH, FABE, and CARPENETI, Justices.

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Vern Still was held liable on a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Crest Street Community Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Peterson v. WirumAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Janice Silverman v. Eastrich Multiple Investor Fund, L.PCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. O'KELLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Norville v. Carr-Gottstein Foods Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. Native Village of NunapitchukAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Ware v. WareAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Monzingo v. Alaska Air Group, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. PEBBLE LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. ParnellAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Jones v. Bowie Industries, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API