Dunham v. Reichlin
California Supreme Court
J. Hampton Hoge, Len H. Honey and A. Dal Thomson for Appellant. M. H. Tversen and Frank W. Taft for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
These appeals are from judgments for the plaintiffs in consolidated actions. Both causes of action arose out of a collision between an automobile driven by Lorenz Bichen in which the plaintiff Dunham was riding and an automobile driven by the defendant. Dunham suffered personal injuries and in one action sued to recover damages therefor. Lorenz Bichen was killed and the other action was brought by his father to recover damages for alleged wrongful death. The actions were consolidated for trial and were tried by the court sitting without a jury. Judgment for the plaintiff Dunham was entered…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stern v. HillmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
3Cited by7 opinions
- Taylor v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- MacFarlane v. FarwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Hill v. PeresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- De Castro v. RoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Mutual Bldg. & Loan Ass'n of Long Beach v. CorumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.