Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Union Pacific Railroad

California Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1976No. L.A. 30531PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

In this personal injury action appeal, we consider whether plaintiffs were improperly denied their right to a trial by jury. As will appear, we have concluded that, under the particular facts in this case, plaintiffs waived their right to a jury trial. (See Code Civ. Proc., §631, subd. 8.)

Plaintiff minors, through their guardians ad litem, brought this action against, defendants (three railroad corporations and the City of Los Angeles) to recover for personal injuries sustained when a train collided with thé car in which plaintiffs were riding. Plaintiffs, in an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Glogau v. HaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Broadway Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. MacFarlane v. FarwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Harmon v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. De Castro v. RoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Arnel Development Co. v. City of Costa MesaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Vella v. HudginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Edwards v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Andrews v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API