Legal Opinion

Cone v. Cone

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1981No. 8018SC234PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and in denying hers. The court properly granted defendant’s motion if the pleadings and affidavits demonstrate that no genuine issue as to any material fact exists and that defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56 (c); Kessing v. Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 523, 180 S.E.2d 823 (1971); Best v. Perry, 41 N.C.App. 107, 109, 254 S.E.2d 281, 283 (1979).

The pleadings and affidavits presented by plaintiff allege that she did not receive any of the proceeds from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Lane v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Gould Morris Electric Co. v. Atlantic Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Marriott Financial Services, Inc. v. Capitol Funds, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Teachey v. . GurleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Pigott v. City of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Ramsey v. Keever's Used CarsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. In Re FortescueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Hartman v. HartmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API