Legal Opinion

Pigott v. City of Wilmington

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1981No. 805DC421PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

In Smith v. State, 289 N.C. 303, 331, 222 S.E.2d 412, 430 (1976), Chief Justice Sharp, writing for our Supreme Court, stated the following:

[A]s this Court said in Smith v. Hefner, 235 N.C. 1, 7, 68 S.E. 2d 783, 787 (1952), “It is settled law in this jurisdiction that a public official, engaged in the performance of governmental duties involving the exercise of judgment and discretion, may not be held personally liable for mere negligence in respect thereto. The rule in such cases is that an official may not be held liable unless it be alleged and proved that his act, or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Smith v. HefnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Best v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Cone v. ConeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  2. Block v. County of PersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Wilcox v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Hare v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Wiggins v. City of MonroeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API