Legal Opinion

Heirs of Sawyer v. Sawyer

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 15, 1856PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the prohate court allowing the appellee $ 500 for her maintenance during the settlement of the estate of her late husband, George F. Sawyer. It appeared that the deceased died intestate in June, 1852, leaving the appellee, his widow, and leaving no children; and that he was, at the time of his decease, a purser in the United States navy, in which capacity he had served for fifteen or twenty years previous to his death.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a decree of the prohate court allowing the appellee $ 500 for her maintenance during the settlement of the estate of her late husband, George F. Sawyer. It appeared that the deceased died intestate in June, 1852, leaving the appellee, his widow, and leaving no children; and that he was, at the time of his decease, a purser in the United States navy, in which capacity he had served for fifteen or twenty years previous to his death. Letters of administration were granted to the appellee in August, 1852 ; and the settlement of the estate was duly proceeded with, and the decree…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered, at the circuit session in September, by

Redeield, Ch. J.

This is an appeal from the court of probate in the matter of allowing maintenance to the widow of the intestate during the settlement of the estate; and comes into this court upon exceptions to the decision of the county court, affirming the decree of the court of probate.

The statute, upon the subject of this allowance, is very specific and unlimited. It is “ the widow and children, constituting the “family of the deceased, shall have such reasonable allowance out of “ the personal estate, as the…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re estate of LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Crew v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Griesemer v. Boyer & RexWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Dale v. Hanover National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  5. In re estate of LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API