Legal Opinion

Sherwood Brands, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 26, 1997No. 104, Sept. Term, 1996PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WTLNER, Judge.

This is a dispute between two allied insurance companies (Hartford) and their insured, Sherwood Brands, Inc. (Sherwood), over whether (1) Hartford breached its duty under the insurance policies to defend Sherwood in an action brought against it by a competitor, Osem Food Industries, Ltd. (Osem), and (2) if it did breach its duty, Hartford is liable for attorneys’ fees and other litigation costs incurred by Sherwood prior June 18, 1991—the date Sherwood notified Hartford of the underlying action by Osem and demanded coverage. Through rulings on a motion for partial summary…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. SL Industries, Inc. v. American Motorists InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. Bankers & Shippers Insurance v. Electro Enterprises Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Chantel Associates v. Mount Vernon Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. PAJ, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Mesmer v. Maryland Automobile Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Pilkington North America, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Geer v. EbySupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  5. Prince George's County v. Local Government Insurance TrustCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API