Legal Opinion

Geer v. Eby

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 18, 2019No. 115948PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by Beier, J.:

**182 In this garnishment action, we enforce an insurance policy's requirement that the insured inform the insurer of a lawsuit arising out of an otherwise covered automobile accident, ruling that the insurer demonstrated prejudice as a matter of law from its lack of notice of suit. We therefore reverse the district court's garnishment order in favor of the judgment creditor and her insurer, and we reverse the Court of Appeals panel's decision affirming that garnishment order.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Claudia Geer and Edward Eby were…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Companies v. West American InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Bollinger v. NussSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. Hunt v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  4. DeWitt v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  5. O'Bryan v. Columbia Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Granados v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2023
  2. Gruber v. Estate of MarshallCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  3. Granados v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2022
  4. In re Parentage of R.R.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2023
  5. Auto-Owners Mutual Insurance Co. v. Bricks & Stones, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API