Legal Opinion
Chantel Associates v. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 13, 1995No. 71PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASANOW, Judge.
This appeal arises out of an action filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company (Scottsdale) against Chantel Associates (Chantel) seeking a declaration that Scottsdale had no duty to defend or indemnify Chantel in a tort action.1 That tort action (hereinafter referred to as the Epperson action) was instituted in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City against Chantel2 by Valerie McCree, individually and on behalf of her son, Napoleon Epperson, III, (Napoleon) and Lynelle McCree, individually and on behalf of her children, Donald Wilson, Jr. (Donald) and Quanna Wilson (Quanna)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Beatty v. Trailmaster Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Cheney v. Bell National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. PryseskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Sullins v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- American Motorists Insurance v. ARTRA Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Commercial Union Insurance v. Porter Hayden Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Mesmer v. Maryland Automobile Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Assicurazioni Generali, S.P.A. v. Kenneth Neil, Assicurazioni Generali, S.P.A. v. Kenneth NeilCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.