Legal Opinion

Mesmer v. Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 11, 1999No. 50, September Term, 1996PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

This is an action against a liability insurer based upon the insurer’s allegedly erroneous denial of coverage. The issues are whether the action sounds in contract, in tort, or both, and what is the appropriate measure of damages.

I

In January 1989 the Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund (“MAIF”), a state agency, issued an automobile liability policy on a 1981 Buick Skylark to Gladys Mesmer with personal injury liability coverage limits of $20,000.00 per person and $40,000.00 per accident. Krist Leo Salmi of Wheaton, Maryland, was the insurance agent or broker who produced the…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Jacques v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Conway v. Country Casualty Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Jones v. Hyatt Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Walk v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. 100 Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Columbia Town Center Title Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Megonnell v. United States Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Odyssey Travel Center, Inc. v. RO Cruises, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2003

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API