Pilkington North America, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
{¶ 1} Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII(6), we accepted three questions of state law certified by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division:
{¶ 2} 1. “Whether the demand by Pilkington North America for defense and indemnification, as asserted in this case, constitutes a chose in action, as that term is defined under Ohio law?”
{¶ 3} 2. “Whether the policies’ ‘anti-assignment’ clauses bar acquisition by Pilkington North America of such chose in action?”
{¶ 4} 3. “Whether by operation of law insurance benefits for transferred liabilities were conveyed, along…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- General Accident Insurance v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Hybud Equipment Corp. v. Sphere Drake InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Willoughby Hills v. Cincinnati InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Sharonville v. American Employers InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Glidden Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
- Ferro Corp. v. Cookson Group, PLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Fluor Corporation v. Super. Ct.California Supreme Court · 2015
- Wehr Constructors, Inc. v. Assurance Co. of AmericaKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Cincinnati Insurance v. American Hardware Manufacturers Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.