Legal Opinion

Wise v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 1935No. Civ. 10454PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff found to have resulted from a hole, six inches square and six inches deep, dug and left by defendant’s employees in one of its public streets for a period of four or five days. The trial court found in favor of the plaintiff on each material allega-5. *366tion in the complaint and assessed damages in the sum of $1,035.

Defendant relies for reversal of the judgment on three propositions:

First. The evidence is insufficient to support…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leavens v. Pinkham & McKevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Koeberle v. HotchkissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Hook v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Oklahoma City v. HaydenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brown v. Poway Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hoel v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Bady v. DetwilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Aguirre v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Silva v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API