Wise v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McCOMB, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff found to have resulted from a hole, six inches square and six inches deep, dug and left by defendant’s employees in one of its public streets for a period of four or five days. The trial court found in favor of the plaintiff on each material allega-5. *366tion in the complaint and assessed damages in the sum of $1,035.
Defendant relies for reversal of the judgment on three propositions:
First. The evidence is insufficient to support…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Leavens v. Pinkham & McKevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Koeberle v. HotchkissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Hook v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Oklahoma City v. HaydenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
3Cited by19 opinions
- Brown v. Poway Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Hoel v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Bady v. DetwilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Aguirre v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Silva v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.