Legal Opinion
Zisman v. Sieger
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 24, 1985No. 84 C 1772PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILL, District Judge.
At issue is the sufficiency of third party plaintiff, Sieger’s, second attempted service of process on third party defendant, Fujitsu Ltd., a Japanese corporation. Fujitsu Ltd. has moved for an order dismissing this action against it. Fujitsu alleges, first, that it is not subject to personal jurisdiction in this court. Second, Fujitsu claims that service of process was insufficient because it was not made according to the Convention On The Service Of Judicial And Extrajudicial Documents In Civil Or Commercial Matters, more commonly known as the Hague…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Carl Thomas Rauch, III v. Day and Night Manufacturing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Agnes L. Morse v. Elmira Country ClubCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Rowley v. McMillanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Chrysler Corp. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- Shoei Kako Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Peter R. Ackermann, Dieter Schultze-Zeu, Dietger Feder, Detlef P. Eulitz and Karl-Heinz Lingner v. Ira LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. Roussel Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- In Re Chaus Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Schlunk v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Smith v. Dainichi Kinzoku Kogyo Co., Ltd.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.