Legal Opinion

Chrysler Corp. v. General Motors Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 29, 1984No. Civ. A. 84-115PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.

In this antitrust suit, Chrysler Corporation (“Chrysler”) seeks to enjoin the joint venture of General Motors Corporation (“General Motors” or “GM”), the world’s largest automobile company and Toyota Motor Corporation (“Toyota” or “TMC”), the world’s third largest automobile company, to manufacture and market later this year a compact automobile which will be derived from Toyota’s new front-wheel drive “Sprinter.” That car is currently only manufactured and marketed ih Japan.

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has carefully…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Peter R. Ackermann, Dieter Schultze-Zeu, Dietger Feder, Detlef P. Eulitz and Karl-Heinz Lingner v. Ira LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. KM Enterprises Incorporated v. Global Traffic Technologies InCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  3. Jung v. Association of American Medical CollegesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  4. Eli Lilly and Co. v. Roussel Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  5. Atlantigas Corp. v. Nisource, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API