Legal Opinion

Kentucky Bridge & Dam, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 18, 1998No. 93-744CPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

In the law suit as filed, plaintiff seeks damages for a cardinal ehange/breach of contract or, in the alternative, for monies allegedly owed from an unsettled equitable adjustment claim and a claim for termination for convenience settlement costs, plus interest. The above-captioned case comes before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss Count I of the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), and on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Counts I and II of the complaint pursuant to RCFC 56. The…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Minehan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Vanalco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  4. Scan-Tech Security, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  5. PARSONS GLOBAL EX REL. ODELL INTERN. v. McHughCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API