Legal Opinion

White v. City of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 26, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

The facts alleged in the amended complaint in this action (see White v. City of Charlotte, 207 N. C., 721, 178 S. E., 219), are sufficient to constitute a cause of action on which the plaintiff is entitled to recover of the defendants, unless, as contended by the defendants, the injuries which resulted in the death of plaintiff’s intestate were caused by the defendants while they were engaged in the performance of a governmental function. In that event, although the death of plaintiff’s intestate was caused by the failure of the defendants to exercise reasonable care for her safety, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scales v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Parks-Belk Co. v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. White v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Penley v. PenleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Carolina Helicopter Corp. v. Cutter Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Brumley v. . BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Brumley v. BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Atkins v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API