Legal Opinion

Parks-Belk Co. v. City of Concord

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 25, 1927PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.

In Price v. Trustees, 172 N. C., 84, it is said: “It is tbe general rule in this jurisdiction that a municipal corporation when engaged in tbe exercise of powers and in tbe performance of duties conferred and enjoined upon them for tbe public benefit, may not be held liable for torts and wrongs of their employees and agents, unless made so by statute. Snider v. High Point, 168 N. c., 608; Harrington v. Greenville, 159 N. C., 632; McIlhenny v. Wilmington, 127 N. C., 146; Moffit v. Asheville, 103 N. C., 237; White v. Comrs., 90 N. C., 437.

A limitation upon tbe general rule is recognized and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. White v. Commissioners of ChowanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  2. McIlhenney v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. Harrington v. Town of GreenvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Donnell v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Southern Assembly v. . PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Rhodes v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Sides v. Cabarrus Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. McKinney v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Broome v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API