Legal Opinion

Scales v. City of Winston-Salem

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1925PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Negligence cannot be imputed to tbe sovereign, and for this reason, in tbe absence of a statute, no private action for tort can be maintained against tbe State. It follows that such an action will not lie against a municipal corporation for damages resulting from the exercise of governmental functions as an agency of the sovereign power. “The rule is firmly established in our law,” says McQuillin, “that where the municipal corporation is performing a duty imposed upon it as the agent of the State in the exercise of strictly governmental functions, there is no liability to private action on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hill v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. McIlhenney v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. Fisher v. New Bern.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Hill v. . Board of Aldermen of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  5. Dargan v. Mayor of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  3. City of Logansport v. Public Service CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Millar v. Town of WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Holmes v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API